Thursday, September 25, 2008

Just read an angry essay by Margaret Atwood today in the Globe and Mail criticizing Harper's recent comments about the arts. See her essay here. Seems like Harper isn't so keen about funding the arts, because he says that ordinary people don't seem to care for it. It would be very unfortunate if his cutbacks to the arts and culture continue. In Canada, the arts (literature, film making, music, architecture) is already a small and feeble industry (compared to most other countries), and it needs to be encouraged and grown, not pulled back. Canada continues to export creative talent overseas.. and it is necessary to stop this exodus. Why would I want to move back to a place that discourages innovative architecture? Where a society as a whole doesn't want to spend an extra penny on design? Right now, Steven Holl's project- first one in Canada- for the Toronto waterfront is put on hold because of none other than budget issues. For our cities to be inspiring places that people can be proud of (and want to live in), we need to demand more from our governments.. not less.

1 comment:

L@ said...

hmmm, i also bristle at the idea of the "arts being cut"... but $45M is chump change on the national scale. if 2 or 3 corporations pulled their funding or added funding that would amount to a similar loss/gain. it's sort of a wash compared to the billion $ items in the party platforms that are coming out. anyhow, i have no problem with cutting the crap from the arts: no matter what the final $ figure available is, someone has to make a decision about who gets what. maybe some artist putting poop on canvas (literally) may not get funded next year... no loss in my books.